Suddenly taking a black hand on Huawei, this country
Data chart
To be frank, if it were other countries using covert tactics against Huawei, we may still understand; But Portugal, with its thick eyebrows and big eyes, suddenly resorted to such a heinous act, which was somewhat unexpected.
But this is reality, a very cruel reality.
So, we see that this time Huawei has chosen the hard core. A lawsuit filed against the Portuguese government.
Since you claim to be a rule of law society, let the law make the judgment. Although this law can maintain objectivity and fairness, to be honest, I also have doubts.
But we have no other choice.
It's very simple:
1. Portugal suddenly launched a heist, an unfounded charge;
2. Portugal is a dark and ruthless country, with the strictest measures in the entire European Union;
3. This sets an extremely bad precedent and requires high attention.
The reason for Portugal's ban on Huawei is the result of following the EU's 5G toolbox, which means that Huawei products are unreliable and pose a threat to national security, and so on.
Is there any evidence?
There is no reliable evidence at all.
The statement from the Portuguese Security Assessment Committee is quite straightforward, as the relevant companies come from risks that are not members of the European Union, NATO, or OECD.
What is unfounded?
This is the biggest unnecessary thing at present.
Looking at Western media and the official responses from Portugal and the European Union, some friends have said that although Portugal's relevant ban did not directly point to Huawei, it exposed the true purpose of excluding Chinese companies without objective and fair standards.
![Suddenly taking a black hand on Huawei, this country](https://a5qu.com/upload/images/2a14d9f9cd6369aad64d1a6279df22ed.png)
The EU has also made it clear that the ban is Portugal's own decision, and the EU only provides guidance on toolbox evaluation. The final decision depends on the member states.
In other words, the EU's so-called evaluation has a set of technical factor evaluation standards, but what about Portugal? I made my own decision purely out of political evaluation factors.
The European Union is aware of this.
Why is this happening?
We also understand.
The pressure from the United States on Portugal and the speculation of some Portuguese politicians led to sharpening the knife and targeting Chinese companies, and Huawei became the investor.
It should be noted that Portugal's restrictions are completely prohibited, including the ban on all Huawei 5G products, which is the strictest among all EU countries.
What Germany did not do, what France did not do, Portugal fell ahead.
Portugal has set a dangerous precedent, and if such accusations are made, it is not ruled out that other countries will follow suit and submit their names to the United States.
So much so that EU Commissioner Brighton, who couldn't bear to watch it, admitted in an interview with Portuguese media that not all Huawei products have problems, and problematic products should be reasonably controlled by member states; Comprehensive prohibition and exclusion clearly violate the principle of proportionality and exceed appropriate limitations.
Portugal, Portugal, you are so indiscriminate and can be beaten to death with just one stick. It's really unfair.
So, we also see that Huawei, with its grief and indignation, filed a lawsuit against the Portuguese side in court.
In response to a Reuters inquiry, Huawei responded as follows: Huawei Portugal, as a company officially established in Portugal, seeks to protect its legitimate interests and rights in accordance with the law.
Huawei expressed its hope that the Portuguese court can "correct the multiple infringements on its rights" and the "significant adverse effects" of the resolution on the company and its partners.
Let the law make a fair judgment.
This is the way things are, but it is obviously not simple, and considering the current political atmosphere in the West, will the law always be fair?
Finally, let's have three basic opinions.
![Suddenly taking a black hand on Huawei, this country](https://a5qu.com/upload/images/6f81842dab3fda175b10ebf3cef11583.png)
Firstly, we still need to be clear headed.
Don't act impulsively or impulsively, but you must give up some illusions.
We cooperate and comply with the United States, so that the United States can show mercy?
It can only be said to be a dream.
Is there any evidence that the United States accuses Huawei of threatening US national security? There is no evidence, but the United States is going to strangle the world. In the field of chips, the United States is pressuring and enticing countries such as the Netherlands to prevent China from making breakthroughs in this field, right?
So, we have seen two recent paradoxes.
Paradox one, on the one hand, the United States demands that China cooperate with the United States, and even demands that China cut off cooperation with Russia to cooperate with the United States; On the other hand, various extreme pressures are being exerted on China, including suppression in the chip industry and strangulation of Huawei.
Paradox two, among the five permanent members of the Security Council, China is the most peaceful country. It has not participated in or waged a war in 40 years, but it is portrayed by the constantly fighting Americans as a country that is inherently aggressive and adheres to militarism and expansionism. It is truly an international joke.
Faced with such an America, we must be clear headed. Especially in the high-tech field, we may face even more intense suppression and decoupling from the United States.
This is actually the United States using its hegemony to engage in a "high-tech war".
It is also not ruled out that countries like Portugal, due to multiple ideological considerations or unbearable pressure from the United States, may submit their names to the United States.
Secondly, we still need to have the ability to play games.
Dare to struggle, but be even better at it.
To be frank, achieving this is difficult. Specifically, in the case of Portugal, if we make a big fuss about tit for tat, it may achieve results, but it may also hit the nail on the head of some politicians who want to stir up the water and then label China with a black hat.
What should we do?
I always think that Huawei's proactive litigation in the West is a very correct approach. It is on the legal stage that you present evidence, don't always be so unfounded, don't always use cold guns and arrows like this.
Perhaps I still have some respect for the laws of these countries.
![Suddenly taking a black hand on Huawei, this country](https://a5qu.com/upload/images/dfa0f2c6150168a005123e1ccfe20ceb.jpg)
Of course, on another level, it also requires the intervention of national power.
Specifically, in Portugal, the overall relationship between China and Portugal is good, with Chinese companies investing over 100 billion euros in Portugal, which is beneficial for the economies of both countries.
If the Portuguese side were to engage in such political manipulation, if policies were to violate fairness, and if we could abandon the spirit of the rule of law and economic contract, today is Huawei China, and tomorrow will be which company?
Is it still possible for investment to be safe?
I believe that Portugal also has to consider why Portugal wants to rush to the front of things that France and Germany are not doing.
This tests our gaming ability. I believe that Huawei, which cannot be defeated, as well as our great country, have this gaming ability and are standing on the right side of history.
Thirdly, we need to have a strong sense of confidence.
What kind of anger?
Don't cause trouble, but don't be afraid of it. There are difficulties, but overcome them.
I remember in an internal speech before, Ren Zhengfei specifically mentioned that there was a promotional poster posted in the Huawei cafeteria, which was tear jerking.
That was during World War II, when an American journalist stopped a Chinese soldier rushing to the front line.
American Chinese soldier: 16 years old.
American Chinese Soldier: China will definitely win.
The American Chinese soldier smiled and said, "At that time, I had already died in battle.".
Behind the calm dialogue lies a steadfast determination to face death as if returning home.
It's tragic, but it's sure to win!
This reminds me of another Huawei promotional poster, an Il-2 aircraft filled with bullet holes during World War II. It was punched like a sieve during the battle, but it persisted in flying and eventually flew back safely.
![Suddenly taking a black hand on Huawei, this country](https://a5qu.com/upload/images/cc08510ebe500e937de58742546ab58a.jpg)
It's the kind of courage that lives on the brink of death: without scars and scars, where can one have rough skin and thick flesh? Heroes have been enduring hardships since ancient times.
We still need confidence.
The CEO of Dutch lithography giant Asma, Wenninger, had previously warned that he was concerned that the US strangulation policy would ultimately prompt China to accelerate its research and development progress, which would definitely take time. However, the more pressure you put on them, the more likely they are to double their efforts and ultimately create lithography equipment that can rival Asma.
Believe in the power of the market, believe in the power of technology, believe in the power of openness, and attempt to block the path of others will ultimately only block one's own path.
This world is not really that beautiful, but this is reality. Everything still needs to be done, and ultimately it depends on strength to speak.
It is even more important to know that in this world, everything that cannot kill us will make us stronger.