Rule of law

A three-year-old child driving a toy car downstairs accidentally smashed a pedestrian into a comminuted fracture? Recently, the People's Court of Fengxian District, Shanghai, concluded a case of minors infringing on their right to health and ruled that minors and their guardians jointly compensated the injured with more than 250000 yuan in losses. One day last year, a three-year-old child named Zhang accidentally knocked down a pedestrian named Lin while driving a toy car on a square in a residential area in Fengxian, causing Lin to be injured. After the incident, Lin was sent to the hospital for treatment and was diagnosed with a comminuted fracture of the right femoral neck, requiring hospitalization and surgical treatment. After appraisal, Lin's injury constitutes a level ten disability. Due to the inability to reach a consensus with Zhang's parents regarding compensation matters, Lin sued Zhang, his parents Zhang, and Jiang as defendants in Fengxian Court. The defendant argues that the amount spent on the plaintiff's treatment, appraisal, etc., as well as disability

With the acceleration of the aging process, many retired workers choose to return to work because they cannot sign labor contracts after retirement, and they often encounter difficulties in safeguarding their rights. Recently, the People's Court of Fengxian District, Shanghai, concluded a dispute over the liability of labor service providers. A retired migrant worker died of heatstroke while working, and their family members ultimately received corresponding compensation. After retiring, Qi started working at a vegetable market operated by a certain market company, mainly engaged in cleaning work. On a day in July 2022, 70 year old Qi suddenly fainted and fell into a coma while working. He was later taken to the hospital for treatment and passed away the next day due to ineffective rescue efforts. The diagnosis result and cause of death issued by the hospital are heatstroke. The negotiation between Qi's family and the market company regarding compensation for Qi's death was unsuccessful. Therefore, the dispute over the liability of the labor provider for injury was taken as the basis of the case