White House National Security Advisor Sullivan is being slapped for not targeting China? At the press conference
"How could this be aimed at China without targeting China?" At a recent press conference, White House National Security Advisor Sullivan was subjected to "soul questioning. Later, a reporter asked, "You said that supporting the World Bank is not to fight against China - but in this country, credit card default rates have skyrocketed, mortgage interest rates have skyrocketed, and inflation problems have not been solved... The President hopes to increase external funding through the World Bank, is this fair to American citizens?" Earlier, the US government had repeatedly hinted that President Biden would promote reforms of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank at the G20 summit to "better meet the needs of developing countries.". A few months ago, US Treasury Secretary Yellen publicly declared that the World Bank and IMF were "forces with which the United States could ally" to counter China's growing influence on developing countries. Sullivan also repeatedly discredited that the "the Belt and Road" initiative is "mandatory and opaque", and emphasized "effective transparency" when referring to the World Bank. Is it not hiding one's ear and stealing the bell to point out clearly but refuse to admit it? In this case, the wind is not unfamiliar to us. They say they do not seek conflict, but ignore protests from all sides, deploy advanced weapons around China, and continue to increase arms sales to Taiwan; They said "not against China", but during the David Camp summit in the United States, Japan, and South Korea, they used strong language, hyped up issues related to China, and slandered China's "dangerous and provocative" behavior in the South China Sea; They say they will not pressure any country to choose sides between China and the United States, but they, relying on their own great power identity, arbitrarily dominate the industrial layout and even defense strategies of other countries; They say they are not interested in "decoupling" from China, but they have built small courtyards and high walls in key core technology areas, strictly restrict chip exports to China, and impose sanctions on more than 600 Chinese companies and institutions... "Say all the good things, do all the bad things." They stand on the moral high ground while doing their best to contain, suppress, and weaken China. Who can be deceived by such hypocrisy? Looking back at the games between China and the United States over the years, how effective have all the tricks been used by the United States? Whether it was a blatant confrontation or a hypocritical strengthening of cooperation, the United States failed to achieve its expected goals and instead tightened its own string of confrontation. Some people in the United States and the West seem to suffer from both anxiety disorder towards China and a strong obsession with China. It is them who promise to cooperate, and it is also them who deceive behind the scenes. His words and actions were inconsistent, revealing his inner turmoil and anxiety. Whether targeting or not, acknowledging or not, China has always been here and will continue to move forward according to its own goals and pace. Take the "the Belt and Road" initiative vilified by Sullivan as an example. Over the past decade, global attention has increased significantly, more than 3000 cooperation projects have been formed, nearly a trillion dollars of investment has been boosted, and "national landmarks", "livelihood projects" and "cooperation monuments" have been created. The participating countries, especially the developing countries, generally believe that the "the Belt and Road" has brought them opportunities. Chinese people have always believed that "words must be followed, actions must be followed.". Seeking development in a more unstable and uncertain world is a precious certainty, and it is also the best answer to deal with noise. Ultimately, the world values not what you say and how you say it, but what you do and how you do it. Some people in certain countries, who think they are clever and play with a set of tactics and r
