Let's take a look at New York New Jersey Port, Shanghai, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Anhui Institutions | Development | Shanghai, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Anhui
In the five years since the implementation of the national strategy for integrated development in the Yangtze River Delta, significant achievements have been made in implementing the new development concept and constructing a new development pattern. At the same time, the division of labor and cooperation in the integration of the Yangtze River Delta has also entered the stage of reform and tackling difficulties. The New York New Jersey Port Authority, as the first and largest interstate public institution in American history, has played an extremely important role in promoting transportation and economic linkage development in the New York and New Jersey regions. Drawing on the institutional establishment and management operation model of the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey may be of great benefit to the deepening of cost sharing and benefit sharing cooperation in the Yangtze River Delta. It can provide experience and reference for promoting the integration of transportation, ports and other infrastructure and commercial trade cooperation and sharing in the Yangtze River Delta. New York New Jersey Port is located at the mouth of the Hudson River in the northeast of the United States, facing the Atlantic Ocean to the east, and is one of the busiest ports in North America. But the port area belongs to the two states of New York and New Jersey, and due to the ownership of adjacent port areas and the distribution of transportation benefits, there are frequent disputes and frictions between the two states. At the same time, there are significant differences between the two states in terms of economic structure, administrative system, development history, and cultural traditions, further increasing the difficulty of coordination and cooperation. The two states gradually realized that the industrial areas in New York and northern New Jersey were actually a unified whole, and only through active cooperation between the two sides could the problems they faced be solved. In the past, cooperation between New York and its surrounding areas relied on promoting the merger of administrative districts. However, by the 1920s, New York had to further extend into New Jersey and Connecticut, with significant differences between the three states. Coupled with the strong tradition of "local autonomy," this path could not be paved and a new path was needed. Therefore, the two states established an interstate joint committee, namely the New York New Jersey Port Area Development Committee, to conduct a comprehensive investigation and research on the transportation situation of the entire port area, taking the first step towards interstate cooperation. The investigation and analysis indicate that in order to better unify the planning and management of the port area, it is necessary to establish a permanent joint agency between the two states. In 1921, the two states jointly established the New York New Jersey Port Authority, a regional quasi government public institution that operates in a corporate style and is responsible for specialized functions. Although the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey is positioned as a quasi governmental regional public institution, it adopts a diversified and comprehensive development profit model, implementing a corporate operating mechanism of financial self-sufficiency and member state co selection. The Management Committee is the highest authority of the Port Authority of New York New Jersey, similar to the board of directors of a corporation, consisting of 12 members, including 6 from New York State and 6 from New Jersey, appointed and transferred directly by the governor of their respective state. The management committee is responsible for formulating various policies of the Port Authority, but the governors of New York and New Jersey have veto power over the decisions of the management committee members appointed by their respective states, which means that the governors of both states have a certain degree of actual control over the Port Authority. Due to the fact that the Port Authority
