Is there a problem?, Proposed female cadre with a strand of white hair in front of her forehead, Director | Husband | Question
In the online world, where everyone is in the limelight, there are also some bizarre aspects of self media supervision. This has stirred up another considerable controversy. A female cadre in a certain area needs to be publicly announced for her proposed new position, but unexpectedly, netizens have discovered a strand of white hair in front of her right forehead. As a result, "Isn't this intentional provocation?" "How could such a person become a cadre?" It was a huge uproar, as if she had to be taken down!
After investigation, it was found that this strand of white hair was originally born and given by her parents. Since the female cadre joined the company many years ago, this strand of white hair has never been touched, and there is no such thing as "deliberate coloring by young students"... Finally, this unfounded "white hair controversy" has been temporarily quelled.
Due to the "White Hair Incident", people may remember another "White Headed Incident" three years ago. A grassroots cadre in a certain area, who is in his thirties, is also planning to take on a new position at the township level due to his outstanding anti epidemic efforts. However, when a public photo is released, the young man in his thirties has white hair. As a result, there is a lot of controversy about "hiding his age" and "hiding from the sky and crossing the sea".
After investigation, it was found that the comrade's age was not fraudulent, and he was a young man born in the 1980s. His "white hair" was due to the fact that his "little white hair" had already turned white, and he had worked in poverty-stricken areas for several years, working day and night with a combination of white and black, five and two, so his hair was becoming increasingly "white". There was no trace of "tricks" here. Recently, this comrade has undergone rigorous organizational review and has come to a certain place in Shanghai for temporary employment. It can be seen that the "supervision" three years ago was just speculation and speculation.
There is also a photo online these days, claiming that a female director of a police station is wearing a name watch and driving a luxury car. This time, the scene has become even worse, claiming that she has "unknown income" and suspected of being a "corrupt official" due to her "suspicion of bribery". After a local organization's "overnight investigation", it was found that she did have a Rolex watch. It was a pair of couple watches bought on her husband's birthday three years ago, one for each person, priced at 70000 yuan. After checking the bank account, it was found that the money was from his private account. As for the Audi A8, it was also owned by his husband, and the female director only used it temporarily that day - and her husband, who was... The chairman of a large company has a legitimate and innocent income, and there is no suspicion of bribery.
After the "bribery" failed and the "source" was cleared, the "supervisor" naturally "adjusted the gun head" and said "even if you have money, you cannot be extravagant", so he had no choice but to "supervise". But one thing can be emphasized: online supervision is already a good thing and a tool for anti-corruption. It has also exposed achievements like "Xi'an cousin" and "Nanjing 95th emperor". However, public opinion supervision should, in principle, be democratic supervision of party and government activities. Supervision should focus on politics, speak based on facts, and cannot exaggerate or speculate, let alone vulgarize or vulgarize, speak nonsense, and be absurd, to the extent that it harms innocent people and tarnishes the reputation of online supervision. As for the so-called "supervision" under the dark psychology of "hating officials", "hating police officers", "hating wealth", and so on, it is actually only half a step away from falsely accusing and slandering - that photo of a "famous watch and luxury car" was originally a "revenge" action triggered by a party's failure to do things at the police station?
By this point, I recall Director Li, who attended a conference wearing "precious earrings" in recent years. At that time, it was also a hot topic. Later, when it cooled down, she said, "Her monthly salary is 18000 yuan, so it's normal to buy a pair of 30000 earrings." Some even suggested that her earrings might have been counterfeit for tens of yuan, but there was no follow-up. However, videos and photos of Director Li still working and attending a meeting have been uploaded online recently. Even if this matter is over, this is really a joke from knowledgeable people that "there are strange things happening in the internet era, and each leader has only been around for a few days."?
