Don't lose focus on the "dismissal dress" in public opinion, state-owned enterprise executives "hold hands" in the dismissal dress | state-owned enterprise executives hold hands with the opposite sex to go shopping | hold hands with the door

Recently, a video of a state-owned enterprise executive holding hands with the opposite sex to go shopping has become a hot topic on the internet. Based on comprehensive information from multiple sources, both parties involved are suspected to be leaders of a state-owned enterprise, Mr. Hu, and employees of the same enterprise, Mr. Dong.

After the video of "Hand in Hand" was exposed, it quickly became a hot topic in the public opinion field. Due to the involvement of an extramarital affair and Dong's outstanding appearance and fashionable clothing, many topics in the public opinion revolve around "lace". Some people take this as an example to analyze the bright and balanced clothing of both parties involved, which is pleasing to the eye and can be regarded as a fashionable example of dopamine dressing for couples. Someone enthusiastically delves into Dong's family background, past experiences, and personal life by discussing her appearance, figure, fashion taste, and lifestyle. After Hu was dismissed from his position, some people jokingly referred to the dress worn by Dong as a "dismissal dress". The same dress quickly rose to the hot search list on e-commerce platforms and became a hot selling item

The topic sparked by a "peach scandal" is inevitably mixed with gossip, but "holding hands" has a more crucial and important focus. Numerous issues and clues related to public interests require public opinion to closely monitor and question them. If public opinion spends too much resources on gossip, it may lead to a lack of focus and failure in public discussions.

Firstly, the moral cultivation and lifestyle of leading cadres are nothing small, which is a warning bell that the "Hand in Hand Gate" incident has sounded. According to multiple sources, Hu holds the position of Executive Director, Party Secretary, and General Manager of a state-owned enterprise. Such a leading cadre caught up in an extramarital affair scandal is not only related to personal domain and morality. The ideological and moral character, moral cultivation, lifestyle, and family ethics of leading cadres often affect the character, quality, and style of the leadership team in their unit, which in turn affects the leadership and combat capabilities of the leadership team. The Party's discipline has always attached great importance to the moral cultivation and lifestyle of leading cadres, and strictly regulates and demands cadres in these aspects. After the video of "Hand in Hand" was exposed, Hu was quickly dismissed from his position and subjected to further investigation by the company's disciplinary committee and further handling by the company. This incident once again demonstrates that the moral character and lifestyle of leading cadres are not personal matters, but rather important disciplinary issues that must be strictly grasped and managed with a clear stance.

Secondly, how to improve the internal management and supervision of party organizations is another issue raised by the "Hand in Hand" video. Both parties involved belong to the same company and have a hierarchical relationship with each other, but they are affectionate and do not avoid suspicion in public places or in front of follow-up cameras. According to the video publisher, both parties involved are fully aware of the filming of this video and have not opposed it. Faced with the camera, they even took the opportunity to show off and walked out of the good feeling of a celebrity walking on the red carpet. Isn't there any trace of being so blatant and high-profile within the company? Or are the internal institutions responsible for supervision turning a blind eye, or even turning a blind eye? Some netizens have found through the official promotional materials of the company that Dong has received some honorary titles within the company. However, the list of "advanced deeds" is either just ordinary job responsibilities, or it is very difficult to call them "job responsibilities". The effortless act of "forwarding superior notices" is used to promote it seriously. With these "achievements", one can be awarded the title of "advanced". Is there any influence and support from Hu behind this? Has the internal supervisory agency played a supervisory and control role in the relevant links?

In fact, at the time of the exposure of the "Hand in Hand Gate" video shooting, the 10th Central Inspection Team was conducting inspections at the superior group company of the enterprise. After the video of "Hand in Hand" was exposed, the street photography photographer involved quickly set his social media account as a "private account", and the unit where the person was involved also quickly cancelled his social media account, responding to the media that "this is personal behavior and has nothing to do with the company.". Until the Central Inspection Team received relevant reports and dealt with them in accordance with the law and regulations, Hu was quickly dismissed from his position. The twists and turns in this process are thought-provoking and should be highly vigilant.

Again, from the corruption cases investigated in the past, it can be seen that extramarital affairs among leading cadres often go hand in hand with power and sex transactions and power and money transactions. It is also worth questioning whether there is any corrupt behavior behind the "Hand in Hand Gate". On Dong's personal social media account, flaunting wealth is an important theme. The extravagant and reckless extravagance, the extravagant material desires, and the extravagant and extravagant lifestyle all leave people stunned and their "three values" shattered. Is this consumption behavior true? Is the source of funds legal? These issues have attracted high public attention. There are also many clues that may point to corrupt behavior in her self flaunting, and it is necessary to conduct investigations based on them to respond to public questioning with clear investigation conclusions.