Why don't you keep it for yourself, Please answer: "If nuclear wastewater is safe, Japan nuclear wastewater | Japan | safe."
According to reports, Tokyo Electric Power Company has recently started injecting seawater into the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant's contaminated water discharge tunnel. At present, the tunnel engineering of the sea discharge project has been basically completed. In April of this year, the company stated that it would strive to complete the equipment related to emissions in the nuclear power plant area by the end of June, and the possibility of discharging into the sea starting from July at the earliest increases. The Fukushima nuclear power plant has experienced the highest level of nuclear accident, with a large amount of radioactive nuclides in the contaminated water, which is completely different from the water quality discharged during normal operation of the nuclear power plant. There is no precedent for nuclear wastewater being discharged into the sea globally, and there is a huge unknown danger. Since the Japanese government unilaterally announced its decision to discharge pollutants from the sea in April 2021, both the domestic and international communities have expressed strong concerns and opposition has been increasing. However, the Japanese government and TEPCO have been talking about fulfilling international responsibilities, listening to opinions from all parties, and respecting domestic public opinion, but their deviant steps have never stopped. Well, people from all over the place are still debating, doubting, and evaluating the plan. On the other hand, TEPCO turns a deaf ear, bypassing the question of whether it is possible and heading straight to the question of how to do it. With a heavy head, they have dug up all the tunnels for discharging nuclear wastewater. The Japanese government has always firmly claimed that it is "safe" to filter and dilute nuclear wastewater before discharging it into the sea. In fact, these nuclear wastewater had full contact with the melted core and contained over 60 radioactive nuclides, including carbon-14, iodine-29, and other extremely long half-life nuclides. Even after filtration, it still contains residues of radioactive substances such as tritium, carbon-14, cobalt-60, strontium-90, which are difficult to completely remove, posing great harm to marine organisms and humans, and can be described as endless consequences. According to the Helmholtz Center for Marine Research in Germany, radioactive materials will spread to half of the Pacific Ocean within 57 days and pollute global waters in 10 years. As for Japan's use of dilution to reduce the concentration of radioactive substances in nuclear contaminated water without controlling the total amount of all radioactive isotopes, it is more like a trick of self deception. At the just concluded incense ceremony, in front of Japanese Defense Minister Yasuki Hamada, Fiji officials directly pointed out Japan's contradictory behavior: "If Japan says nuclear wastewater is safe, why don't they keep it?" In order to gain public support, the Japanese side has not been idle. While vigorously promoting international public relations, attempting to whitewash oneself, I ended up getting a bad deal. At the G7 Hiroshima Summit, Japan hoped to include the content of "supporting" the discharge of nuclear wastewater into the sea in a joint statement, but it was strongly opposed by other countries. On the one hand, they vigorously sold their grievances and claimed from an objective perspective that the burden was too heavy and the budget was limited, making it impossible to implement other plans. But the Pacific is the world's Pacific, not Japan's "sewer". Just casually saying "lack of money" can shift the blame onto all humanity? Moreover, the Japanese government, obsessed with the "normal national dream" and the "breakthrough constitutional dream", not only revised the new version of the "Three Security Documents" by the end of 2022, but also significantly increased its defense budget on this basis. Is this a lack of money or a lack of morality? The ocean is a common property of humanity, and international conventions such as the
