Why do some people lack trust in grassroots cadres? Half month Talk: There are these four reasons

Half Month Talk Commentator

In recent years, with the continuous deepening of comprehensive and strict governance of the Party, the standardization of various grassroots affairs has been continuously improved, and the space for grassroots cadres to act recklessly has been greatly reduced. However, some people still hold a distrust attitude towards rural cadres when discussing public affairs in the village. Once encountering things that they are not satisfied with, some people will complain, "They have connections," "they operate privately," and "there are some tricks involved.". In fact, many times this is not the case. Rural cadres feel aggrieved about this, believing that they have put in a lot of effort and effort to do their work, and in the end, they cannot do well.

Take a case report from "Half Moon Talk".

In a certain place in the southwest, the county built a second-class highway and expropriated about 20 mu of land in a village. Everyone had a dispute over this. The township government stated that the distribution plan has been discussed and approved by representatives of the masses. Some villagers, however, firmly believe that there is something fishy going on. "It must be the village party branch secretary colluding with township cadres for fraud." Communication was unsuccessful, and they could only rely on the intervention of relevant departments of the higher-level government.

After investigation, it was confirmed that there were no issues related to the transfer of benefits. This fuss not only increases the workload of grassroots cadres, but also delays the progress of the project. Township government staff feel very wronged.

According to a report by Half Moon Talk, there are many similar cases at the grassroots level. Especially when it comes to matters such as interest distribution, dispute resolution, and policy enjoyment, if their psychological expectations are not met, some people may easily speculate that grassroots cadres are friendly and seeking personal gain. Grassroots cadres believe that they are lying down without reason, which affects their work enthusiasm.

What kind of cadres are needed at the grassroots level? We need cadres who can help the people solve problems, as well as those who can withstand setbacks, grievances, and confusion, and can persevere. We encourage grassroots cadres to have a "big heart" to withstand grievances, but we also need to deeply analyze the reasons why some people lack trust in grassroots cadres.

In summary, there are four reasons.

Firstly, some grassroots cadres are not familiar with the masses and may not easily gain trust when faced with issues. Some grassroots cadres have said that township and village cadres are currently busy with various tasks, with little interaction and understanding of the people's thoughts and expectations. The people also do not know what town and village cadres are doing all day, resulting in some grassroots cadres being busy but unable to gain their understanding.

Secondly, some grassroots cadres have a rough work style and strong communication methods. "I have fought countless ways to win this project. Do you have any objections?" "If you don't sign, there's nothing left!" Such a strong statement makes it uncomfortable to listen to, and communication will naturally be compromised. The result is that "cadres feel that the masses are not obedient, and the masses feel that cadres are not obedient.".

Thirdly, not adhering to principles and smearing mud, leaving behind contradictions and hidden dangers. Some grassroots cadres have a calm mentality of "less is better than more", believing in the set of "getting things done is stability, getting things done is level, doing nothing is skill, compromise is harmony", not adhering to rules and principles, opening up institutional loopholes, and even sacrificing the interests or principles of the majority to compromise and exchange. Although the problem was solved temporarily, hidden dangers lurked.

Fourthly, being hesitant and hesitant may lead to suspicion among the masses. Some grassroots cadres have a low understanding and grasp of the new policy, and their handling methods are not appropriate, which can easily lead to public questioning. "I have found that some cadres are hesitant and hesitant when facing public inquiries, no wonder the people are suspicious." A township leader said that whether the problem can be properly handled depends on the professional competence and ability of grassroots cadres.

Rural cadres are the vanguard of rural governance, serving as the bridge and link between the Party and the government and the farmers. In the context of the rapid transformation of rural society and the increasingly diverse needs of villagers, it is urgent to enhance the work ability and professional quality of the masses.

To win the trust of grassroots people, grassroots cadres should have the courage to take responsibility and take the initiative. As long as it is in line with the interests of the people, they should dare to intervene and make decisions, so that the people can feel a sense of reliance and ambition from the bottom of their hearts; At the same time, to do good things well, we must adhere to fairness and integrity, and serve people with fairness.

Especially for matters related to agricultural policies and subsistence allowances, fairness and impartiality must be achieved, with a clear distinction between public and private interests. One must not favor one over the other, nor should there be differences in personal relationships. Only in this way can we be reasonable, emotional, and properly resolve various conflicts and disputes.