The fundamental way to maintain credibility is through the investigation results of the "Rat Head Duck Neck" investigation! Media comment: Only seeking truth from facts is involved | Food safety | Investigation results
It's really a mouse head, not a duck neck.
According to the report just released by the joint investigation team of Jiangxi Vocational and Technical College of Industry on the "6.1" food safety incident, it was determined that the foreign object was not a duck neck by viewing the video of the cafeteria kitchen, consulting the procurement list, questioning the responsible person of the cafeteria, the relevant parties of the kitchen, the students involved, and the onlookers on site. According to the professional identification of the on-site photos and videos taken by the extracted students by authoritative domestic animal experts, it is determined that the foreign object is the head of a rodent like rodent. The Changdong Branch of the Market Supervision Administration of Nanchang High tech Zone and Jiangxi Vocational and Technical College of Industry did not conduct a serious investigation and evidence collection, and the conclusion that the foreign object is a duck neck was incorrect.
This result is in line with the public's predictions based on the video, as well as their expectations for the joint investigation team.
When a college student restaurant discovers a rat head, they don't first care about whether the student's body is damaged, but rather about the image of the cafeteria and the reputation of the school. The first step has already shown that there is a ghost in their heart; The combination of pretending to compare with students, asking the parties involved to record videos to clarify the facts, and asking the local market management bureau to endorse is all too flashy to handle.
Did you keep it from me to me? Has the image of the restaurant been protected? Has the school's reputation been preserved? Is there still credibility in the market supervision department? For the sake of a rat head, a food safety incident where a few words can make it clear, sincere apologies can earn forgiveness, and resolute corrections can earn trust, so many people have come up with so many self proclaimed clever methods. In the end, schools and market supervision departments have paid a high cost of trust, and this loss is not measurable by money, nor can it be immediately repaired after rectification. Pointing at rats as ducks, playing with fire and self immolation, concealing the truth, and using the credibility of the government are really not worth it.
The rapid establishment and work explanation of the joint investigation team, although there are always a few people or units who deceive us, is our style of seeking truth from facts. We must tell the truth to the public, and we can only tell the truth to the public. As long as what is said is true and what is done is practical, even if there are some problems in the work, the public will understand. On the contrary, any act of playing tricks or being clever with the public cannot deceive their sharp eyes.
The cost is extremely huge, and the lesson is profound. The relevant responsible persons and units must be dealt with seriously in accordance with discipline and law, making them pay the appropriate price. According to the report, the Market Supervision Administration of Nanchang City has revoked the food business license of the cafeteria involved, and imposed maximum penalties on the involved enterprises and legal representatives. It has been determined that Jiangxi Vocational and Technical College of Industry bears the main responsibility for this incident, the enterprises involved bear direct responsibility, and the market supervision and management department bears regulatory responsibility. Next, relevant departments will strictly deal with relevant responsible units, involved enterprises, and responsible persons such as Jiangxi Industrial Vocational and Technical College, Nanchang High tech Zone Market Supervision Administration Changdong Branch, in accordance with the law and regulations. They will also carry out special food safety rectification throughout the province, focus on source control, and effectively ensure food safety for the people.
A noteworthy detail is that the joint investigation team, after inspecting the scene and retrieving surveillance videos, found that on June 1st, a student in the cafeteria ate a foreign object suspected of being a "rat head", which was discarded by the cafeteria staff on the day of the incident. Is this staff member responsible for eliminating evidence voluntarily or at the behest of others? Losing a rat's head cannot ignore the facts, let alone the punishment of laws and regulations.
Only seeking truth from facts is the fundamental way to maintain credibility. Never do such foolish things as "pointing a mouse for a duck" again!
