The Chinese side firmly refuses!, International Bureau of Education: More than 10 times mentioning China! NATO Summit's clich é s repeat: Capital | Lithuania | Summit

On July 13th, China News Agency reported that leaders from multiple countries have gathered in the Lithuanian capital Vilnius, and a NATO summit is currently taking place. On the evening of the 11th local time, the NATO official website released the summit communiqu é reached by the attending government leaders.

Widely hyping up the "China threat theory" and exaggerating the "China nuclear threat"... In this communique, NATO has targeted China again, mentioning China more than 10 times.

Zhao Junjie, a researcher at the European Institute of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, pointed out in an interview with China News Network that behind NATO's "nonsense" at this summit, the "thief logic" of NATO's leader, the United States, attempting to consolidate hegemony, was exposed.

The "Trumpet" of the United States

NATO acts as a tool to contain China

The NATO summit statement directly points to China's "attempt to disrupt the rule-based international order, including space, the internet, and the ocean," claiming that China's policies "pose a" systemic challenge "to NATO interests, security, and values.".

Data image: NATO identification.

"At present, the game between China and the United States has reached its deepest level. No matter how many times the communique mentions China, the United States will definitely not miss the advantageous opportunity of the NATO summit." Zhao Junjie pointed out.

He further analyzed that firstly, NATO is a "product of the Cold War" that was used by the United States after the Cold War, and now plays the role of "fire brigade captain" or "military police" in Europe and even globally; Secondly, NATO is the "NATO of the United States". As the "mouthpiece of the United States", NATO is regarded by the United States as a "strategic tool" used to contain China.

In fact, China has always been the creator and maintainer of the current international order. Yang Tao, Director General of the US Department of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, recently stated, "China is the first country to sign the United Nations Charter, the creator and maintainer of the current international order, and also the beneficiary. Why do we need to change the existing international order? Some people always say" rule-based international order ", and what rules is that based on?"

On the other hand, the leader of NATO, the United States, according to a research report by the World Trade Organization, is the "least compliant" organization to date, with two-thirds of its violations being caused by the United States. At its root, as the spokesperson of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs previously stated, there is a "hegemonic heart based on American interests" hidden under the packaging of the "rule-based international order" of the United States.

To render a "nuclear threat"

"One stone, three birds" in the United States?

In this communique, NATO hyped up China's "nuclear threat" and urged China to "participate in discussions on reducing strategic risks and promote stability by increasing transparency in its nuclear weapons policies, plans, and capabilities.". Meanwhile, in the communique, NATO repeatedly declared itself a "nuclear alliance".

Regarding this, Zhao Junjie believes that NATO has expressed its calculations on two levels: the first level means to say it is for China to listen to, and on the surface, it appears to be hitting China; The second meaning is for Russia to hear, that NATO is not only a conventional military alliance, but also a military alliance with nuclear deterrence. Through such statements, NATO hopes to give small European countries a reassurance.

"More of it is about psychological warfare. As the leader of NATO, the United States' strategic intention is to kill three birds with one stone. It can be said that the United States is a skilled player in manipulating people's hearts and maneuvering," said Zhao Junjie.

On July 11th, a spokesperson for the Chinese Embassy in the European Union stated that the NATO summit communiqu é was full of old and repetitive Cold War thinking and ideological biases. The content related to China in the communique disregards basic facts, distorts China's position and policies recklessly, and deliberately smears China. China firmly opposes and refuses this.

On the 12th, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Wang Wenbin also responded. He pointed out that NATO, as the military alliance with the most and strongest nuclear weapons, has been vigorously engaged in "microphone diplomacy" in recent years, irresponsibly exaggerating the "China nuclear threat", which is completely a reversal of the original plan and extremely hypocritical.

Arch fire pouring oil

"Wherever NATO goes, there is no peace."

It is worth noting that NATO also called on China to "play the role of a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council and condemn Russia's military actions against Ukraine" in the communique. NATO views cooperation between China and Russia as an attempt to mutually reinforce and disrupt the rule-based international order, which goes against its values and interests.

In fact, over the past year, NATO member states have vigorously promoted military aid to Ukraine and imposed sanctions on Russia, which has been a catalyst for escalating tensions between Russia and Ukraine. Recently, the United States has decided to provide cluster bombs to Ukraine, breaking through the humanitarian bottom line.

Zhao Junjie pointed out that the accusation of China in the NATO Communique on the Russia Ukraine issue is a "bandit logic", described as "only state officials are allowed to set fire, and people are not allowed to light lamps" in ancient Chinese language.

He concluded, "The values of the United States only emphasize combativeness, not coordination, treating itself as the embodiment of justice, yet inserting the political dagger into 'institutional opponents'."

Zhao Junjie also believes that NATO, led by the United States, is not truly maintaining security and stability in Europe. On the issue of Ukraine, some European countries have had to choose sides.

"Wherever NATO goes, there is no peace," he pointed out.

【