It's really pointless. The Chinese Ambassador to South Korea has put down this sentence candidly | Bull playing the piano | Korean | Ambassador
Reprinted from the WeChat official account Niu Danqin, author Niu Danqin
To be frank, I have some concerns about the current trend of China South Korea relations. The originally good relationship suddenly changed in South Korea, making it a bit incomprehensible.
So, we see that on June 8th, when Chinese Ambassador to South Korea Xing Haiming met with the leader of the South Korean Democratic Party, Lee Jae ming, the sentence he left behind was very meaningful and even more insightful.
According to the embassy's briefing, the two had a lot of discussions that day. But there is a saying that Ambassador Xing Haiming said: he hopes that the South Korean side can get rid of external factors when dealing with relations with China. The United States is making every effort to suppress China, and some people are betting that the United States will win and China will lose. This is clearly a misjudgment and they have not seen the historical trend clearly.
Why are you saying this?
Everyone should understand.
Finally, Ambassador Xing Haiming also said that 30 years ago, some people criticized China and launched the so-called "China collapse theory". 30 years later, China proved the mistakes of those people with concrete achievements. People who bet on China losing now will definitely regret it in the future.
The key is this sentence: Those who lose betting on China now will definitely regret it in the future.
Sharp enough!
Who is betting on America winning? Who is betting on China losing again?
The next day at the press conference of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, it was rare to see several Q&A posts posted after the press conference, the first of which was like this.
Spokesperson Wang Wenbin: Currently, China South Korea relations are facing difficulties and challenges, and the responsibility does not lie with China. Ambassador Xing Haiming has extensive contact with the South Korean government, political parties, and various sectors of society to exchange views on bilateral relations and issues of common concern, and to introduce China's position and concerns, which is his responsibility. I hope that the relevant parties in South Korea can have a correct view and focus on how to face the problem and achieve stability and development of China South Korea relations.
Among them, mentioning Ambassador Xing's views has attracted public attention in South Korea. What is the method of attention?
It is interesting that South Korea not only fails to treat it correctly, but also shows enthusiasm.
According to reports, the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs summoned Xing Haiming on June 9th. South Korean Deputy Foreign Minister Zhang Huzhen stated that Ambassador Xing Haiming condemned the South Korean government's policies in front of numerous media outlets and expressed "strong regret" by issuing a "stern warning".
In addition, Kim Ki hyun, the leader of the ruling National Power Party in South Korea, has decided not to be invited to dinner with the Chinese ambassador.
The Chinese ambassador's words make some Koreans unable to sit still.
This is not reminiscent of the previous round of confrontation between China and South Korea: On the evening of April 27th, Liu Jinsong, Director of the Asia Department of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, met with the Minister of State of the South Korean Embassy in China, Jiang Xiangxu, to make serious representations regarding the erroneous statements related to China in the US South Korea joint statement, expressing strong dissatisfaction, emphasizing China's solemn position on Taiwan and other issues, and urging the South Korean side to strictly abide by the One China principle.
Please note: Late night appointment, serious negotiation, expressing strong dissatisfaction.
Looking at the pictures at that time, Liu Jinsong and Jiang Xiangxu, dressed in suits and leather shoes, both had serious faces. This is obviously not an easy meeting.
Why is China strongly dissatisfied?
Because South Korea President Yin Xiyue was visiting the United States at that time, the joint statement issued by the United States and South Korea pointed out what to do on the Taiwan issue.
You should know that a week ago, there were inappropriate remarks about the South Korean President's involvement in Taiwan. Chinese Vice Foreign Minister Sun Weidong summoned the South Korean ambassador to express strong dissatisfaction, believing that Yin Xiyue's remarks are completely unacceptable.
It is interesting that South Korea also summoned the Chinese Ambassador to South Korea on the same day, strongly protesting and criticizing China's related statements as impolite behavior.
It has to be said that this approach is quite Korean.
But the recent developments in South Korea are indeed quite remarkable.
Therefore, we can see that the United States is very happy, Japan is very satisfied, the US Japan South Korea relations are warming up, Canadian Prime Minister Trudeau went to South Korea, and had a drink with Yin Xiyue on purpose
But is it really beneficial for South Korea to blindly submit names and statements to the United States and Japan?
The consequences are also predictable.
On the Peninsula issue, I saw an ominous sign. Will the northern part of the peninsula swallow the breath of the various actions of the United States, Japan, and South Korea? The recent situation on the peninsula is really becoming increasingly worrying. Is this good for South Korea?
In terms of Japan South Korea relations, South Korea's self deprecating diplomacy naturally pleased Japan, but what about South Korea's national dignity? Is knee bending diplomacy that disregards history good for South Korea?
On the issue of Ukraine, Russia is currently very angry with South Korea. With Russia's personality, it is not ruled out that some countermeasures will be taken. Anyway, it is enough for South Korea to drink a pot. Is this good for South Korea?
4. The US and South Korea seem to be in a honeymoon period now, but don't forget that the US is even monitoring the South Korean presidential palace, and the US is also pressuring South Korean companies not to fill the market share left by Micron in China. What about South Korea's national interests? Is this good for South Korea?
5. China is South Korea's largest trading partner, and South Korea has made bold remarks on some sensitive issues, even taking sides. Some Koreans are worried that this will lead to "unbearable diplomatic consequences.". Is this good for South Korea?
Some Koreans may be gambling, betting that the United States wins, and betting that China loses. So, South Korea has been taking frequent actions recently, and China South Korea relations are also deteriorating.
But is this in line with historical trends? Don't forget, neighboring countries are neighbors that can never be moved away.
Indeed, whether viewed from the past, present, or future, there are millions of reasons to improve China South Korea relations, and not a single reason to ruin them.
So, Ambassador Xing Haiming's statement is truly accurate: those who bet on China losing now will surely regret it in the future.
The proposal was a momentary pleasure.
But in this world, when you come out to mess around, you always have to pay back. Korea, Korea, many things need to be thought twice before taking action, don't regret it later.
Personal opinion does not represent any organization