Father is a "deadbeat" causing daughter to lose 710 points on the list? Judge: Similar stories are purely rumors, Father | Article | Lai Lai
A few days ago, an article titled "My daughter failed in the college entrance exam due to my father being a" Laolai "!" was circulated on WeChat. The reporter of Beijing Youth Daily noticed that similar articles have been circulated on the Internet for several years. The Internet joint platform for refuting rumors said that rumors of "Laolai's father harming my children in the college entrance exam" frequently appeared during the college entrance exam. Behind these rumors are often scams carefully designed by rumormongers.
Guo Wei, Deputy Director of the Executive Bureau of the Fengtai Court in Beijing, told the Beijing Youth Daily reporter, "These are purely rumors. The story versions are vastly different, but the plot is surprisingly similar."
Similar stories have been circulating in multiple versions, and the plot is basically the same
The article states that a girl scored 710 in the college entrance examination but was rejected by the school due to her father's dishonest loan. The admissions office believes that her father is not trustworthy, and her daughter is also likely to be affected. Universities cannot admit people with unethical conduct.
A reporter from Beijing Youth Daily found that similar stories have been circulated in multiple versions of the article, with the plot basically the same. It is because the father is a "deadbeat", and the daughter scored 710 points but was not admitted. The only difference is that the names of the candidates are sometimes different. The protagonist of the story is sometimes called "Xiaoxiao", sometimes "Xiaoxia", and sometimes "Lulu".
In addition to this version, there are other similar stories, such as "The old man's father refuses to repay the money, and his son is rejected by a prestigious university" and "He was unable to be admitted to a prestigious university simply because his father is a old man".
The Supreme Court once clarified that normal education cannot be classified as a restriction
The reporter of Beijing Youth Daily noticed that the original text could not be seen after the page of the article was opened at present, but the opinions of the Internet joint rumor refutation platform.
According to the Internet platform, at the press conference of the second session of the 13th National People's Congress in 2019, the Supreme People's Court had clarified that the credit punishment measures taken against the dishonest executors were only to restrict the noble schools with high fees, and normal schooling such as compulsory education and high academic education could not be listed as restrictions.
The rumor that "the father of a scoundrel will harm his children's college entrance examination" has also repeatedly appeared during the college entrance examination period, and behind these rumors are often carefully designed scams by rumormongers. We would like to remind netizens to distinguish rumors, not believe them, and not spread them.
The Beijing Youth Daily reporter noticed that the People's Court of Lvyuan District in Changchun City has also published a legal education article, stating that with the increasingly perfect social credit system, a credit punishment pattern of "one breach of trust, limited everywhere" has gradually formed. Some higher education institutions have relatively strict qualification reviews, and candidates are likely to be unable to pass the school's political review due to their parents' dishonest behavior.
On June 30th, a reporter from Beijing Youth Daily consulted some police academies as family members of the candidates. A police academy admissions staff member said that when recruiting students, they only looked at whether the political review was qualified or not. Whether the parents of the candidates were listed as dishonest and executed individuals would affect the candidates depends on the results of the investigation by the local public security organs.
According to a query by a Beijing Youth Daily reporter, based on the items and standards of political inspections in some public security colleges, those who are lawfully listed as objects of joint punishment for dishonesty fail the political inspections, but it is not clear whether the candidates are qualified if their parents are "deadbeats".
Executive Director: Purely interpreting legal errors and using sensational online rumors to attract attention
Guo Wei, Deputy Director of the Executive Bureau of the Fengtai Court in Beijing, told the Beijing Youth Daily reporter that similar stories have vastly different versions, but surprisingly similar plots. They are all due to the fact that their parents were dishonest and executed, commonly known as "deadbeats". Their children scored high in the college entrance examination but were not admitted, using sensational questions and regretful photos to attract attention.
"These are purely rumors," Guo Wei said, stating that executed individuals are generally subject to punishment measures such as restricting consumption or being included in the list of dishonest executed individuals. Among them, the restriction order mainly restricts their high consumption and non essential consumption for daily life or business. According to Article 3 (a) of the Several Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Restricting High Consumption and Related Consumption of Persons Subject to Enforcement, children are not allowed to attend high fee private schools. The original intention of this regulation is to urge the debtor to fulfill their payment obligations as soon as possible, thereby prohibiting the debtor from paying high tuition fees for their children's enrollment, rather than limiting their children's right to education. The main purpose of being included in the list of dishonest executed persons is for the court to publicly disclose the credit status of the executed persons, indicating that they have used methods such as forging evidence, violence, threats, etc. to obstruct or resist execution in cases of execution; Evading enforcement through false litigation, false arbitration, or concealment or transfer of property; Violating the property reporting system; Violating the high consumption restriction order; The debtor refuses to perform the settlement agreement without justifiable reasons; Others who have the ability to fulfill but refuse to fulfill the obligations determined by effective legal documents.
Guo Wei stated that the above two measures are mainly aimed at constraining economic consumption and credit punishment, rather than limiting children's legitimate rights to receive normal compulsory education and higher education. At the same time, he reminded parents who are subject to enforcement to actively fulfill their legal obligations, in order to avoid their dishonest behavior affecting innocent children and affecting their learning and life.
