Did you measure the highest in your family? The truth is here, selling explosive nuclear radiation detectors
In recent days, the entire network has been discussing nuclear radiation detectors.
Someone was measuring everywhere, but unexpectedly discovered that,
The place with the highest nuclear radiation is actually one's own home.
What is the reason for this?
The nuclear radiation at home is too high,
Will it affect our health?
The radiation value at home is "too high"
Is it caused by decoration and building materials?
Many nuclear radiation detectors display interfaces that can measure radiation such as X-rays and beta rays, as well as food, cosmetics, marble, and more. The reporter consulted with the merchant, who stated that it can also be used for indoor home measurement.
When measuring outdoors, the instrument displays only 0.06-0.08 μ Sv/h, but when brought indoors, it actually increased by 0.1-0.2 μ Sv/h. " Xia Yunqi began to worry, is the nuclear radiation at home the strongest?
![Did you measure the highest in your family? The truth is here, selling explosive nuclear radiation detectors](https://a5qu.com/upload/images/d1b18b11bdbd39d6b230a1d13379de58.jpg)
Because she lives in a coastal city, Xia Yunqi, a native of Zhejiang, is afraid of being affected by nuclear radiation, so she can buy a measuring instrument and rest assured. In the community and at home, he held up a Geiger counter and measured it everywhere. He found that the radiation value displayed at home was the highest. When measured in the bathroom and bedroom, the index still slightly increased, but the fluctuation was not significant.
Online, many people have posted their own measurement values, mostly within 0.1 μ Around Sv/h. Some people suspect that it is due to building materials, as tiles and marble have high radiation. Some people also say that in the future, when it comes to interior decoration, everyone will have a nuclear radiometer and personally measure the radiation level of building materials, making it difficult to do business in the building materials market.
Is there any radiation in building materials? On August 29th, the reporter visited Zhonghao Building Materials Market in Shangcheng District and consulted several stone, board, decorative materials, and ceramic bathroom shops.
In several marble shops, marble panels are displayed with various colors and textures. The shop owners all claim that their products do not have radiation, but there are no nuclear radiation related testing reports, and there is no safety level label on the stone.
"When it comes to radioactivity, many things around us are actually radioactive. As long as they do not exceed the standard, they are harmless to human health. The raw materials we produce are all tested and there will be no cases of excessive radiation levels," said a shop owner.
But there is a type of marble specifically marked with the words "zero radiation", and the shop owner said it is artificial marble.
"Generally speaking, natural marble has relatively higher radiation than artificial marble. If you are concerned about radiation issues, it is recommended to choose artificial marble." A building materials store owner told reporters that there are indeed many people who are worried about radiation when choosing Dali stone. "If there are buyers who are particularly concerned about radiation, I will tell them not to worry and to buy artificial marble."
A ceramic tile shop owner in the market, Huang Jin, told reporters that granite, marble and other stones may have radiation problems because natural stones contain some natural minerals and may contain harmful elements to the human body. However, consumers do not need to worry too much when choosing. And the owners of fabrics and wood have all expressed that their own materials do not have any nuclear radiation.
Huang Jin also reminds that if you are concerned about the potential hazards of radiation, formaldehyde, and other decoration materials, it is recommended to choose a reputable manufacturer and well-known brand, and to inquire about the corresponding quality inspection standards and certificates when decorating materials.
Lin Boqiang, Dean of the China Energy Policy Research Institute at Xiamen University, told me that marble and ceramic tiles can cause cancer?
![Did you measure the highest in your family? The truth is here, selling explosive nuclear radiation detectors](https://a5qu.com/upload/images/8310436f4b2476d983f09e87ebd1d511.jpg)
Authoritative experts have long verified
There have been various opinions about the hazards of marble building materials. There are many rumors online that the rare gases produced in marble have strong radioactivity, which can harm human health and even cause cancer.
In the building materials market, marble shop owners and journalists have said that although there has been no change in customer flow in recent days, customers often come to ask about radiation issues, and people have increased their consideration of safety in this regard.
A few years ago, in order to verify the authenticity of the claim that "marble radiation poses a health hazard", CCTV conducted an investigation and reported that in the building materials market, Zhu Li, Executive Deputy Director of the Radiation Protection Office of Tsinghua University, used professional instruments to conduct on-site testing of the radiation value of marble. The results show that several marble samples belong to Class A building materials, which can be safely used without any restrictions on their scope of use.
CCTV has also conducted scientific testing on the radioactivity of various building materials on the market by inviting authoritative institutions.
"The marble samples sent for inspection have detected lower levels of radioactivity, even lower than wood, glass, and ceramic tiles, but they are all within the national control standards for radioactivity, so there is no need to panic," said the inspector.
Zhu Li introduced that there are currently two national standards for building radioactive materials: first, whether the radioactivity of building materials exceeds the standard should refer to the national standard GB-6566 "Radionuclide Limits for Building Materials"; second, whether the radioactivity inside the building exceeds the standard. Please refer to the national standard GB-50325 "Code for Indoor Environmental Pollution Control in Civil Building Engineering".
According to this standard, if it is detected that the radioactivity in the stone or building exceeds the standard, the relevant department can initiate a responsibility lawsuit against the supplier of the materials that exceed the standard and impose corresponding penalties.
So, how much dose is safe to measure nuclear radiation at home?
The reporter found on the official website of the National Nuclear Safety Administration that the radiation dose limit for the public in China is 1 millisievert per year, which is consistent with the standard set by the International Atomic Energy Agency.
![Did you measure the highest in your family? The truth is here, selling explosive nuclear radiation detectors](https://a5qu.com/upload/images/5a9f466f0ca13eaa9e41e5df1e1d3f87.jpg)
In special circumstances, if the average annual dose for five consecutive years does not exceed 1mSv, the effective dose for a single year can be increased to 5mSv.
After simple conversion, it can be concluded that according to 365 × 24 hours, the maximum nuclear radiation dose rate in the environment cannot exceed 0.5 μ Sv/h. From market experience, it is usually around 0.20 μ Sv/h or below is relatively safe.
The National Nuclear Safety Administration has also issued a document stating that 1mSv/year is not a safety limit, and the impact of 1mSv/year on health is minimal, even smaller than natural background, so there is no need for too many safety concerns.
"1mSv/year is a management limit for practice, intervention, and radiation sources, rather than a safety limit for whether harm is caused. Therefore, not exceeding 1mSv will have an impact on physical health. In fact, no occupational diseases related to nuclear radiation have been observed in professionals with an average annual limit of 20mSv worldwide.".