Comics | "Risk Reduction" Tags Difficult to Cover the Face of the United States in Suppressing China | The United States | Towards China | Risks
Recently, senior US officials have repeatedly stated that they do not seek confrontation, cold war, or decoupling from China, but instead focus on so-called "risk reduction". But how do they drive "risk reduction"? Labeling economic and trade activities with China as "risk", promoting the "de Sinicization" of key industrial chains and supply chains, and creating "small courtyards and high walls" that disrupt normal Sino foreign technological exchanges... is this not decoupling from China, but what is it?
What changes is only the caliber, what remains unchanged is the behavior. The real intention behind the trap of American rhetoric is to decouple from China under the guise of "risk reduction" and continue to contain and isolate China. As a Western slang goes, "You can apply lipstick to a pig, but it's still a pig."
Click on the link to learn more
Xinhua News Review: "Removing Risks" Difficult to Mask the Essence of Preventing China - One of the series of comments on the pitfalls of "removing risks" rhetoric
![Comics | "Risk Reduction" Tags Difficult to Cover the Face of the United States in Suppressing China | The United States | Towards China | Risks](https://a5qu.com/upload/images/0f912f24f05c3355d2860737eb2f7f16.jpg)
Jointly produced by Xinhua News Agency and the International Department of Xinhua News Agency
Produced by Xinhua News Agency's International Communication Integration Platform