92 provincial management cadres who are not suitable for their current positions have been adjusted!, Zhejiang's Action: Over the Past 5 Years of Mistakes | Implementation | Correction | Methods | Persistence | Errors | Zhejiang | Cadres

On the afternoon of June 7th, the Zhejiang Provincial Government Information Office held a press conference, introducing the relevant situation around the theme of "implementing the 'three distinctions', motivating cadres to take on responsibilities, building a new era of party building highland that emphasizes diligence and integrity, and a political ecology that is clean, upright, and enterprising".

According to the press conference, Zhejiang will resolutely adjust those cadres who are not responsible or suitable for their current positions, even if there are no violations of discipline or law. Over the past five years, a total of 92 provincial management cadres who are not suitable for their current positions have been adjusted. It is worth noting that since 2020, 231 cadres in the province have been promoted and reused after the disciplinary period has expired.

For those cadres who are not responsible or suitable, even if there are no violations of discipline or law, they will be resolutely adjusted

The press conference introduced that Zhejiang has successively made a series of deployments, including the construction of a good squad leader, a good team, and a good team, and building a strong Zhejiang Iron Army that stands at the forefront. Especially this year, the Zhejiang Provincial Party Committee has clearly proposed the "Four Adherences and Eight Nos" guidance for selecting and appointing talents:

Adhere to the principle of prioritizing career development and selecting talented individuals, without neglecting or burying outstanding cadres from various regions, fields, departments, units, and age groups;

Adhere to fair and just selection and appointment of talented individuals, and do not mistreat or neglect the "three oxen" of young, pioneering, and old scalpers;

Persist in promoting and promoting the selection of talented individuals, and do not cater to, tolerate opportunistic, troublemaking, forming cliques, seeking connections, or using excuses as cadres;

Adhere to organizational principles to select and appoint talented individuals, and do not compromise or indulge self righteous officials who bargain with the organization. Make it clear what kind of people to use and what kind of people not to use.

In terms of the use of cadres, emphasis should be placed on those who are in the main battlefield of reform and development, those who have undergone arduous and arduous job training, and those who have been rooted in the grassroots frontline for a long time. At present, 58.8% of the party and government officials in prefecture level cities have experience in the next level of party and government officials; Among the municipal party and government leadership teams, 71.4% have experience in county party and government leadership teams or township party and government positions. At the same time, for those cadres who are not responsible or suitable, even if there are no violations of discipline or law, they will be resolutely adjusted. Over the past five years, a total of 92 provincial management cadres who are not suitable for their current positions have been adjusted.

Implementing fault tolerance and error correction is not about loosening discipline or creating so-called "protective umbrellas"

Namely:

Distinguish the mistakes and mistakes made by cadres due to lack of experience and trial and error in promoting reform from the violations of discipline and law committed knowingly;

Distinguish the errors and mistakes in exploratory experiments that have not been clearly restricted by superiors from the disciplinary and illegal behaviors that continue to go their own way even after being explicitly prohibited by superiors;

Distinguish between unintentional negligence for promoting development and disciplinary and illegal behavior for personal gain.

Zhejiang has consistently implemented the orientation of "taking responsibility for those in charge, taking responsibility for those in charge, and supporting those in action". In 2016, Zhejiang took the lead in issuing the "Several Opinions on Improving the Fault Tolerance and Exemption Mechanism for Reform and Innovation" nationwide. Recently, Zhejiang Province drafted the "Implementation Measures for Deepening the Implementation of the" Three Distinctions "and Establishing a Sound Fault Tolerance and Error Correction Mechanism to Motivate Cadres to Take on Responsibility".

The press conference introduced that the biggest feature of this Implementation Measures is to make fault tolerance situations "scenario based". From daily work, identify the scenarios with the most concentrated demand for fault tolerance and the most prominent reflection in actual work, involving multiple aspects such as reform and innovation, work decision-making, etc., and clarify the specific fault tolerance situation. To put it vividly, it is like a ruler, defining specific scenarios for fault tolerance, and specifically sorting out 6 categories and 21 types of fault tolerance situations strongly reflected at the grassroots level, including errors and errors in reform and innovation, errors or flaws in work or execution procedures, losses caused by work decisions, errors and errors in emergency response and resolution of complex contradictions, and errors and errors caused by objective factors in fulfilling responsibilities.

Implementing fault tolerance and error correction is not about loosening discipline or creating so-called "protective umbrellas". For those who are not resolute in implementing the Party's line, principles, policies, and decision-making arrangements, act recklessly, bend the law for personal gain, and seek personal gain in their work, discipline and rules must be put at the forefront.

The Implementation Measures specifically point out that fault tolerance and error correction should adhere to four principles: adhering to the principle of putting cause first, motivating and taking responsibility, adhering to seeking truth from facts, objectivity and fairness, adhering to discipline and law, and combining leniency and strictness, adhering to the principle of tolerance and correction, and preventing minor errors.

What should be tolerated is to boldly tolerate mistakes and let the majority of cadres dress lightly and roll up their sleeves to work hard. We firmly refuse to tolerate things that should not be tolerated. Fault tolerance and error correction work not only encourages and supports cadres who bravely shoulder heavy responsibilities and forge ahead, but also seriously investigates and punishes cadres who engage in reckless behavior, violate discipline and laws.

The Implementation Measures specifically stipulate six situations where fault tolerance is not allowed, and strictly adhere to the bottom line of discipline and law, including:

Those who do not comply with the major decisions and deployments of the Party Central Committee, violate the Party Constitution, Party rules, Party discipline, mandatory and prohibitive provisions of national laws and regulations;

Failure to establish a new development concept, incorrect or even distorted views on political achievements, and engaging in "image engineering" and "political achievement engineering";

Using the influence of power or position to seek illegitimate benefits for the unit or for personal gain;

Not actively rectifying and eliminating the impact of errors and errors that occur, etc.

When there are errors and errors in the comprehensive judgment work, the Implementation Measures specifically mention that not only should we focus on analyzing motivation, attitude, objective conditions, etc., but also "pay attention to analyzing remedial situations.". Whether to timely recover losses and effectively prevent the occurrence or expansion of harmful consequences are prerequisites to consider in fault tolerance. "The work of fault tolerance and error correction must be based on facts, carefully discerned, comprehensively, dialectically, and developmental perspectives, and handled fairly and justly," said the relevant person in charge of the Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision.

Learn from mistakes and mistakes, and plug loopholes. The Implementation Measures propose to strengthen error prevention and correction. Promote the improvement of policy measures and institutional mechanisms for high-frequency issues with concentrated fault tolerance demands and cases, and prevent the frequent occurrence of errors of similar nature.

For party members, cadres, and other personnel performing official duties in accordance with the law who are falsely accused or falsely accused, the Implementation Measures state that "timely clarification and rectification of the name should be made"; At the same time, we will comprehensively use disciplinary, legal and other means to seriously investigate and punish false accusations and framing behavior.

Judging whether a cadre is wrong or not, and whether they should be held accountable, cannot be shot to death with a single blow, and must be scientifically defined as wrong

The promulgation of the Implementation Measures for Fault Tolerance and Error Correction actively draws on the positive practices of relevant sister provinces, regions, and cities based on the absorption of existing experience. Judging whether a cadre is wrong or not, and whether they should be held accountable, should not be done with a single blow, and should be scientifically defined as wrong. This "scale" clearly defines the boundaries and bottom line of "wrong" and conducts a specific analysis of six dimensions:

1., it is based on the long-term, taking into account the overall situation, out of public will and unintentional loss, or one-sided pursuit of short-term benefits and local interests, seeking personal gain and knowingly committing crimes.

2., it depends on whether the situation is special, urgent, difficult and complex, unpredictable, or regular work and normal environment.

3., whether to strictly implement legal procedures such as collective decision-making and request for instructions and reports, or to engage in individual arbitrariness, blind decision-making and subjective reckless action.

4., whether it is reform and innovation, exploration and experiment, or whether there are orders or prohibitions; whether it is a general problem or a major principle error.

5., whether it is slightly controllable, with less loss and less impact, or whether it damages the interests of the party, the state and the people and causes greater impact.

6. look at the specific analysis of the remedial situation.

The press conference introduced that while fault tolerance is encouraging, it is also necessary to learn from past mistakes and cure diseases to save people. In recent years, Zhejiang has continued to make efforts to encourage cadres to take on the role and promote the implementation of the "three distinctions.

According to the Implementation Measures, if it is determined that fault tolerance has been granted, measures such as not allowing or exempting accountability or mitigating accountability shall be taken based on the nature and severity of the problem. According to the Implementation Measures, cadres who have been identified as fault-tolerant and are not or exempted from being held responsible shall not be affected in terms of evaluation, commendation, rewards, selection and appointment, promotion of positions and ranks, and evaluation of professional titles and positions. For those who are held accountable for leniency or reduction, after the expiration of the impact period, those who have earnestly learned lessons, performed well, and met the conditions will not affect the selection, appointment, or promotion of positions and ranks.

Conduct follow-up education for disciplinary personnel and promote their transformation from being "wrong" to being "capable". Since 2020, Zhejiang has launched the "Follow up Education Week" activity. From 2020 to 2022, a total of 15461 disciplinary party members and cadres were revisited in the province. Since 2020, based on the results of follow-up education in the province, it has been found that 231 disciplinary party members and cadres who can truly repent their mistakes, have outstanding achievements, and are recognized by the public have been promoted and reused after the disciplinary period expires.