Millions of US military emails were mistakenly sent to..., with a word difference mistakenly sent to Mali | Millions of US military emails

Release time:Apr 14, 2024 07:07 AM

According to British media reports, over the years, millions of emails originally planned to be sent to the US military have been mistakenly sent to the African country of Mali, where the internet domain name suffix is ". ml", due to personnel mistakenly writing the address incorrectly when sending emails - mistakenly writing the US military email domain name suffix ". mil" as ". ml". The report stated that despite warnings issued by insiders for over a decade, the US government did not take this seriously, resulting in the leakage of non confidential but sensitive information.

One word difference, brewing an oolong

The domain name suffix for email addresses of US military personnel is ". mil", while the network domain name suffix for Mali is ". ml", which is very similar. According to a report by the Financial Times on the 17th, for many years, personnel have been continuously making mistakes in sending emails, resulting in millions of emails originally planned for the US military being mistakenly sent to Mali.

It is reported that there were both external and internal sources who sent the wrong email.

On the one hand, the mistakes were made by travel agents who served the US military. Some mistakenly sent emails also contain passport numbers sent by special issuing agencies of the United States Department of State.

Another contractor who made a mistake was the one who collaborated with the US military, reportedly involving hand grenade training ammunition produced by General Dynamics for the US military.

The Financial Times also reported that eight emails originally planned by the Australian Ministry of Defense to be sent to the United States were also sent incorrectly, including a report on the corrosion issue of the Australian F-35 fighter jet. The Australian Department of Defense responded by saying "no comment on security issues".

On the other hand, even insiders of the US government can make mistakes. For example, a FBI agent related to the US Navy attempted to send six messages to military email but mistakenly sent them to Mali. It included an urgent diplomatic letter from Türkiye to the US State Department, concerning the possible actions of the PKK against Türkiye's interests in the US.

This person also sent a series of domestic terrorism briefings in the United States labeled "official use only", as well as a global counter-terrorism situation assessment report labeled "not to be released to the public or foreign governments.".

Many people have mistakenly sent their account passwords used to access US Department of Defense archives, as well as recovery passwords for intelligence systems, to Mali.

It is reported that most emails are regular emails without any "confidential" information. However, some of the information involves highly sensitive data of active US military personnel and contractors, including medical information, identification information, crew lists, base staff lists, facility maps, base photos, naval inspection reports, contracts, criminal charges against personnel, internal investigations into bullying, official itineraries, tax and financial records.

For example, there are emails that have been sent incorrectly regarding the plans of US Army Chief of Staff James McConnell and his delegation to visit Indonesia in May this year. The specific information includes the hotels where McConnell's team stayed in Indonesia and the details of their check-in.

"This is not uncommon," said retired Navy Admiral Mike Rogers, who previously served as head of the US National Security Agency and the US Cyberspace Command.

But Rogers also pointed out the severity of this mistake. "If you continue to have this access, you can even obtain intelligence from non confidential information... making mistakes is human, but the problem is the size, duration, and sensitivity of the information."

Lasting for ten years without receiving much attention

It is reported that about 10 years ago, the Dutch Internet entrepreneur Johannes Zuerbir first discovered this problem. He signed a contract with Mali to manage the country's network domain name.

In 2013, when Zulbir took over the Mali network domain ". ml", he quickly noticed that emails were sent to non-existent addresses with domain suffixes such as "arm. ml" and "navy. ml". Afterwards, Zulbir established a system to receive such communication, but the system was quickly overwhelmed by a large amount of information and stopped functioning.

After realizing that these emails might have been sent to the wrong address, Zulbeer had multiple contacts with US officials, including a military officer stationed in Mali, a senior advisor to the US National Cybersecurity Agency, and even White House officials... but to no avail.

Since the beginning of this year, Zulbeer has once again started collecting emails that were mistakenly sent, attempting to persuade the US to take this issue seriously. During this period, he received nearly 117000 messages that were mistakenly sent, and even received nearly a thousand messages within a day.

In early July, Zulbeer wrote to the US side, "This risk is real and may be exploited by US opponents."

In response, US Department of Defense spokesperson Tim Goleman stated on the 17th that the Pentagon is aware of this issue and will take the leakage of relevant information seriously.

Pentagon Deputy Press Secretary Sabrina Singh also stated that the leaked emails were not sent from the official Defense Department email, but from personal email. The Pentagon has taken preventive measures and strongly opposes the use of personal email addresses for official purposes.

However, Gorman also acknowledges that the Pentagon cannot prevent external personnel from mistakenly sending emails to Mali, and all it can do is provide further guidance and training to internal personnel.

According to the BBC, current and former US officials have stated that US military communications marked as "confidential" and "top secret" are transmitted through different information technology systems and are unlikely to be leaked due to technical issues. However, human factors deserve attention.

However, this is not the first time this year that the US military has exposed such an issue. In February of this year, multiple US media outlets reported, citing senior Pentagon officials, that a configuration error on a US Department of Defense server in the past two weeks had led to the leakage of internal military emails, but did not involve confidential information.

Lee McKnight, a professor of information research at Syracuse University in the United States, commented on the latest developments and said that the US military should be grateful because domain name issues have already attracted attention. Moreover, these emails were mistakenly sent to Mali instead of falling into the hands of cybercriminals.

It is reported that the contract for managing the Malian network domain name ". ml" by Zulbir expires this week, and control of the domain name will also be transferred to the Malian government. At the same time, these mistakenly sent emails are also expected to be handed over to the Malian government.

Public opinion has noticed that the close relationship between the Malian government and Russia has made this deadlock even more subtle. Rogers believes that transferring control of the ". ml" domain name to the Malian government would bring significant problems. He said that this could become an advantage that foreign governments can leverage.

The Malian government has not yet responded to this.

Another noteworthy point is that not only the US military is at risk of sending the wrong email. The email domain name suffix ". nl" used by the Dutch military is also very similar to the network domain name suffix ". ml" in Mali

Received endorsement from the United States and South Korea? Japan may finalize schedule for Fukushima nuclear contaminated water discharge into the sea, US, Japan, South Korea | Kishida | Nuclear wastewater | Japan
Received endorsement from the United States and South Korea? Japan may finalize schedule for Fukushima nuclear contaminated water discharge into the sea, US, Japan, South Korea | Kishida | Nuclear wastewater | Japan

On the 20th local time, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida immediately went to the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant after his trip to the United States to inspect the preparations for the discharge of contaminated water into the sea. Japanese media also reported that the Japanese government will hold a cabinet meeting on the 22nd to finalize the schedule for the discharge of Fukushima nuclear contaminated water into the sea. Public opinion has noticed that in the context of the Fukushima nuclear contaminated water discharge plan seemingly receiving support from the US and South Korean governments, Kishida's visit to Fukushima this time aims to win the support of local people for this plan. However, there are still many questions to be answered regarding the Fukushima nuclear contaminated water discharge plan. Before making a final decision, I would like to personally visit the site. On the 18th local time, after meeting with US and South Korean leaders in the United States, Kishida stated that he will go to Fukushima before the 20th to inspect the preparations for the discharge of nuclear contaminated water into the sea. For

The Russian central bank urgently raised interest rates by 350 basis points, causing the Russian ruble to drop to a nearly 17 month low. The Russian central bank urgently raised interest rates, and the ruble exchange rate fell
The Russian central bank urgently raised interest rates by 350 basis points, causing the Russian ruble to drop to a nearly 17 month low. The Russian central bank urgently raised interest rates, and the ruble exchange rate fell

According to foreign media reports, the Russian central bank held a non routine interest rate meeting on the 15th local time, during which it decided to raise the benchmark interest rate by 350 basis points from the previous 8.5% to 12%. The previous day, the exchange rate of the Russian ruble against the US dollar fell below 100 rubles per dollar, marking the first time since March last year that it has fallen below this psychological threshold. After the Russian central bank announced its interest rate hike decision, the ruble has rebounded somewhat. According to reports, the Russian central bank announced a significant interest rate hike on the 15th, stating that as the ruble depreciates and inflation expectations rise, this decision is aimed at limiting the risk of price stability. However, the Russian central bank has previously stated that it has not seen any threat to financial stability from the decline in the ruble. It is reported that due to the previous drop of the ruble to US dollar exchange rate below 1 to 100 rubles, it was originally scheduled for September

WHO says "we need to pay attention". COVID-19 mutant EG. 5 attracts attention from WHO | COVID-19 mutant EG. 5
WHO says "we need to pay attention". COVID-19 mutant EG. 5 attracts attention from WHO | COVID-19 mutant EG. 5

Recently, the number of cases infected with COVID-19 variant strain EG. 5 has been on the rise in many parts of the world. On the 9th, the World Health Organization listed EG.5 as a "variant that needs attention.". However, experts and scholars generally believe that EG. 5 will not pose a serious threat to public health. The mutated strain that needs attention, due to naming differences, appears to be a new strain of EG.5. In fact, it is not the case. Like strains such as XBB.1.16, EG. 5 is also a member of the Omicron family. This means that compared to other recently popular Omicron variants, the changes in EG. 5 are relatively limited, unlike the leap from Delta to Omicron. However, EG. 5 is also constantly evolving and currently has its own branch, EG. 5.1. In terms of symptoms, compared with other COVID-19 strains

Is Twitter hanging?, Threads users quickly surpassed 100 million Zuckerberg | Musk | Twitter | Threads
Is Twitter hanging?, Threads users quickly surpassed 100 million Zuckerberg | Musk | Twitter | Threads

On July 10th, Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of "Yuan" Inc. in the United States, stated on his Threads account that within less than a week of its launch, the number of registered Threads users has reached 100 million. How can this new platform achieve such astonishing user growth? What impact will it have on the competitive landscape of social media? Various issues have attracted public attention. Zuckerberg said on his Threads account that since its launch on July 6th, the number of registered Threads users has reached 100 million over the weekend. He also said that this was achieved in the context of Threads not yet launching large-scale promotion. "I can't believe it's only been five days!" Zuckerberg previously revealed that on the first day of its launch, Threads attracted 30 million users to register and became an Apple app provider

Finalizing the Military Industry Cooperation Roadmap, Intended for China and Russia? US Defense Minister Visits India | US Defense Minister Visits India
Finalizing the Military Industry Cooperation Roadmap, Intended for China and Russia? US Defense Minister Visits India | US Defense Minister Visits India

According to foreign media reports, on June 5th local time, during the visit of US Secretary of Defense Austin to India, the two countries have developed a roadmap for defense industry cooperation in the coming years. The public opinion believes that the US government is strengthening its defense partnership with India, freeing India from its dependence on Russia in defense and achieving the goal of balancing China in the Asia Pacific region. Strengthening India's "Defense Manufacturing Ambition" Local time from June 4th to 5th, Austin departed for India after concluding the Shangri La Dialogue in Singapore. This is his second visit to India since March 2021. During the visit, Austin met with Indian Defense Minister Singh and finalized a roadmap for defense industry cooperation between the two countries in the coming years. In response, the US Department of Defense issued a statement stating that this move aims to change the cooperation between the defense departments of the two countries