But drinking 9 cans of zero sugar soda a day is enough to exceed the limit. WHO: Aspartame may cause cancer | Aspartame | WHO

Release time:Apr 14, 2024 05:20 AM

According to foreign media reports, two organizations under the World Health Organization announced on the 14th that aspartame has been listed as a possible carcinogen, but can still be consumed normally under the condition of not exceeding the limit. Specifically, if there are no other sources of food intake, adults weighing 60 to 70 kilograms will consume more than 9 cans of zero sugar drinks containing aspartame per day to exceed their daily allowance. However, researchers also suggest that for consumers, whether it is zero sugar drinks or sugary drinks, drinking water is not as healthy as drinking water.

What do the affiliated institutions of the World Health Organization say?

Aspartame is an old-fashioned sweetener that has been approved and widely used for nearly 50 years. It is added to a range of products such as zero sugar soda, chewing gum, jelly, ice cream, yogurt, cough drops, etc.

This sweetener is about 200 times sweeter than ordinary sugar and contains fewer calories than ordinary sucrose, so many dieters and diabetes patients use it as a substitute for sugar. In China, aspartame can be seen in a series of well-known products, including Coca Cola Zero, Pepsi Zero, Pepsi Light Coke, Green Arrow Sugar Free Gum, and more.

However, the International Agency for Research on Cancer, a subsidiary of the World Health Organization, stated in an assessment report released on the 14th that limited evidence suggests a possible link between aspartame and human cancer, and therefore listed aspartame as a substance that may be carcinogenic to humans.

It should be pointed out that according to the IARC classification, carcinogens are divided into four categories: Class 1, Class 2A, Class 2B, and Class 3.

In the 2B category of aspartame, it also includes radio frequency electromagnetic fields and pickled vegetables that come into contact with mobile phones. Processed meat, asbestos, cigarettes, alcohol, etc. all belong to Class 1, while overnight work, red meat, etc. belong to Class 2A, with a higher likelihood of carcinogenesis than aspartame.

On the same day, the Joint Expert Committee on Food Additives under the World Health Organization and the Food and Agriculture Organization also issued an assessment stating that there was no sufficient reason to change the previously established daily allowable intake, which was 40 milligrams per kilogram of body weight.

JECFA reiterated that people can safely consume aspartame within this intake. If there are no other sources of intake, a can of zero sugar soft drink containing 200 to 300 milligrams of aspartame would require an adult weighing 60 to 70 kilograms to drink 9 to 14 cans or more per day to exceed the limit.

After reviewing existing scientific research, both institutions have emphasized that there are still limitations to the existing evidence linking aspartame to cancer.

"The evidence for carcinogenicity in humans and animals is limited, and the mechanism by which carcinogenicity occurs is also limited. This finding emphasizes the need for more research to improve our understanding of whether consuming aspartame poses a carcinogenic hazard," said Mary Schubauer Bergen, a senior IARC official.

Can you still drink sugar free drinks with peace of mind?

Researchers say there is still insufficient evidence linking aspartame to cancer risk.

Paul Farrow, a cancer epidemiology professor at the Siddharthe Medical Center in Los Angeles, USA, believes that aspartame's classification as 2B by the IARC is a very conservative classification, meaning "there is no convincing evidence" to prove its harm, and "the general public does not need to worry about the risk of substances classified as 2B being associated with cancer."

David Crufield, a nutrition expert at the Indiana University School of Public Health, said that almost all substances consumed in excess are dangerous. "Excessive intake can cause toxicity, and even essential nutrients such as vitamin A, iron, and water can lead to death if consumed in excess."

Tracy Bevers, medical director of the Anderson Cancer Center at the University of Texas, said that if people switch to sugary drinks due to fear of the risk of aspartame, obesity and weight gain may pose greater risks.

The relevant industry has also emphasized the view that moderate intake of aspartame is still safe.

Francis Hunter Wood, Secretary General of the International Sweetener Association, where food companies such as Coca Cola and Mars Arrow are located, responded that aspartame, like other low calorie or calorie free sweeteners, can provide consumers with the option to reduce sugar intake and become a part of a balanced diet.

However, some researchers also suggest that people should not take artificial sweeteners lightly.

Francisco Blanca, Director of the Nutrition and Food Safety Division of the World Health Organization, warned that if children drink soda containing aspartame, drinking three cans a day may exceed the limit.

"If consumers are faced with the choice of whether to drink cola with sweeteners or cola with sugar, I think they should consider the third option - drinking water," Blanca said.

Darius Mozafarian, a nutrition professor at Tufts University in the United States, also bluntly stated that he does not believe artificial sweeteners are 100% safe, and "I will try to avoid them as much as possible.".

Previous studies have also shown that whether aspartame or other artificial sweeteners such as erythritol and sucralose, which are widely seen recently, may increase the risk of heart disease, hypertension, diabetes and obesity.

In May of this year, the World Health Organization also advised people not to use sweeteners to lose weight. Because in the long run, replacing free sugar intake with sweeteners is not conducive to weight control.

Received endorsement from the United States and South Korea? Japan may finalize schedule for Fukushima nuclear contaminated water discharge into the sea, US, Japan, South Korea | Kishida | Nuclear wastewater | Japan
Received endorsement from the United States and South Korea? Japan may finalize schedule for Fukushima nuclear contaminated water discharge into the sea, US, Japan, South Korea | Kishida | Nuclear wastewater | Japan

On the 20th local time, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida immediately went to the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant after his trip to the United States to inspect the preparations for the discharge of contaminated water into the sea. Japanese media also reported that the Japanese government will hold a cabinet meeting on the 22nd to finalize the schedule for the discharge of Fukushima nuclear contaminated water into the sea. Public opinion has noticed that in the context of the Fukushima nuclear contaminated water discharge plan seemingly receiving support from the US and South Korean governments, Kishida's visit to Fukushima this time aims to win the support of local people for this plan. However, there are still many questions to be answered regarding the Fukushima nuclear contaminated water discharge plan. Before making a final decision, I would like to personally visit the site. On the 18th local time, after meeting with US and South Korean leaders in the United States, Kishida stated that he will go to Fukushima before the 20th to inspect the preparations for the discharge of nuclear contaminated water into the sea. For

The Russian central bank urgently raised interest rates by 350 basis points, causing the Russian ruble to drop to a nearly 17 month low. The Russian central bank urgently raised interest rates, and the ruble exchange rate fell
The Russian central bank urgently raised interest rates by 350 basis points, causing the Russian ruble to drop to a nearly 17 month low. The Russian central bank urgently raised interest rates, and the ruble exchange rate fell

According to foreign media reports, the Russian central bank held a non routine interest rate meeting on the 15th local time, during which it decided to raise the benchmark interest rate by 350 basis points from the previous 8.5% to 12%. The previous day, the exchange rate of the Russian ruble against the US dollar fell below 100 rubles per dollar, marking the first time since March last year that it has fallen below this psychological threshold. After the Russian central bank announced its interest rate hike decision, the ruble has rebounded somewhat. According to reports, the Russian central bank announced a significant interest rate hike on the 15th, stating that as the ruble depreciates and inflation expectations rise, this decision is aimed at limiting the risk of price stability. However, the Russian central bank has previously stated that it has not seen any threat to financial stability from the decline in the ruble. It is reported that due to the previous drop of the ruble to US dollar exchange rate below 1 to 100 rubles, it was originally scheduled for September

WHO says "we need to pay attention". COVID-19 mutant EG. 5 attracts attention from WHO | COVID-19 mutant EG. 5
WHO says "we need to pay attention". COVID-19 mutant EG. 5 attracts attention from WHO | COVID-19 mutant EG. 5

Recently, the number of cases infected with COVID-19 variant strain EG. 5 has been on the rise in many parts of the world. On the 9th, the World Health Organization listed EG.5 as a "variant that needs attention.". However, experts and scholars generally believe that EG. 5 will not pose a serious threat to public health. The mutated strain that needs attention, due to naming differences, appears to be a new strain of EG.5. In fact, it is not the case. Like strains such as XBB.1.16, EG. 5 is also a member of the Omicron family. This means that compared to other recently popular Omicron variants, the changes in EG. 5 are relatively limited, unlike the leap from Delta to Omicron. However, EG. 5 is also constantly evolving and currently has its own branch, EG. 5.1. In terms of symptoms, compared with other COVID-19 strains

Is Twitter hanging?, Threads users quickly surpassed 100 million Zuckerberg | Musk | Twitter | Threads
Is Twitter hanging?, Threads users quickly surpassed 100 million Zuckerberg | Musk | Twitter | Threads

On July 10th, Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of "Yuan" Inc. in the United States, stated on his Threads account that within less than a week of its launch, the number of registered Threads users has reached 100 million. How can this new platform achieve such astonishing user growth? What impact will it have on the competitive landscape of social media? Various issues have attracted public attention. Zuckerberg said on his Threads account that since its launch on July 6th, the number of registered Threads users has reached 100 million over the weekend. He also said that this was achieved in the context of Threads not yet launching large-scale promotion. "I can't believe it's only been five days!" Zuckerberg previously revealed that on the first day of its launch, Threads attracted 30 million users to register and became an Apple app provider

Finalizing the Military Industry Cooperation Roadmap, Intended for China and Russia? US Defense Minister Visits India | US Defense Minister Visits India
Finalizing the Military Industry Cooperation Roadmap, Intended for China and Russia? US Defense Minister Visits India | US Defense Minister Visits India

According to foreign media reports, on June 5th local time, during the visit of US Secretary of Defense Austin to India, the two countries have developed a roadmap for defense industry cooperation in the coming years. The public opinion believes that the US government is strengthening its defense partnership with India, freeing India from its dependence on Russia in defense and achieving the goal of balancing China in the Asia Pacific region. Strengthening India's "Defense Manufacturing Ambition" Local time from June 4th to 5th, Austin departed for India after concluding the Shangri La Dialogue in Singapore. This is his second visit to India since March 2021. During the visit, Austin met with Indian Defense Minister Singh and finalized a roadmap for defense industry cooperation between the two countries in the coming years. In response, the US Department of Defense issued a statement stating that this move aims to change the cooperation between the defense departments of the two countries